<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QMetry Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.qmetry.com</link>
	<description>The future of Test Management</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Requirements – building the foundation strong.</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=62</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=62#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 05:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[managing requirements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QMetry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Requirements]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Requirements management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[requirements management tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Requirements testing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[requirements tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Requirements – the foundation of any (every) software application/ product. For years software organizations are constantly suffering from various issues related to requirements and hence trying to find better solutions and techniques to manage requirements. But, there is nothing concrete and reliable solutions or techniques/ methodologies yet that can be used as a cent percent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Requirements – the foundation of any (every) software application/ product. For years software organizations are constantly suffering from various issues related to requirements and hence trying to find better solutions and techniques to manage requirements. But, there is nothing concrete and reliable solutions or techniques/ methodologies yet that can be used as a cent percent solution for managing and maintaining requirements in better way. Ideally, it seems very little is done to mitigate this long-living problem and the scope is still limited but highly demanding. Well defined and clear to understand requirements is always one key player that can lead to fewer mistakes and other uncertain or certain errors in the later stages and ensure successful project completion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>What are requirement(s)?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Basically, requirement is a condition or capability needed by a user to solve a problem or achieve an objective that must be met or possessed by a system or system component to satisfy a contract, standard, specification, or other formally imposed document. The IEEE Standard 1233-1998 focuses on 3 important parts (points) that a requirement must contain:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>i)<span> </span></span>Capability</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>ii)<span> </span></span>Condition(s)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span>iii)<span> C</span></span>onstraint(s)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Where, <em>capability</em> means ability of doing something e.g. Computer has data processing capabilities. <em>Condition, </em>state of something (e.g. weather conditions) or in other context existence/ appearance of any entity for something to happen (e.g. Account access can be availed on certain conditions.) and <em>Constraint </em>means either limitation or restrictions e.g. dropping testing activities due to time constraints.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Not just the above three points are equally vital to define and design any requirements for a target application/ product but I would like to add 2 more points and these are <em>Clarity - </em>means free from obscurity and easy to understand and the second one is <em>Complete</em>, which<em> </em>means perfect and up to the mark in every respect.<em> </em>The more clear and complete the requirements, lesser are the chances for errors and mistakes and then the derived hassles.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In other context requirements are the base which finally results in the form of application or a product. Requirements are the documented needs of a project that are gathered to identify the specific constraints (scope) of each project component and act as the foundation for everything else that occurs in a project.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Requirements - The Foundation</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">“Requirements” is the foundation on which any application or product is built upon and also are the pillars on which the product stands on and holds to. Hence, stronger, clearer and constant the requirements better and reliable the product is built and higher the quality achieved.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">In any field if observed closely, if the requirements/ objectives are not clear and properly (precisely) defined the results are always a worry and headache in all the later stages and finally a complete<span> </span>failure; lets take a simple example “One cup of <span> </span><strong>sugar free</strong> tea” now here, the <strong>tea</strong> to be prepared for a <strong>diabetic patient (or sugar free) or a normal person </strong>is not clearly specified (because too many meanings can be derived like i) tea using Sugar free Sugar for diabetic patient or normal person, ii) tea for a diabetic patient with normal sugar, iii) tea for normal person with normal but less sugar, and so on.); thus, it is natural that the prepared tea will contain sugar (either sugar free or normal as it is no t clear enough) which means that the final product is not as expected and this may lead to completely scrap the final product i.e., “Failure” and the reason is poor, unclear or incomplete requirements.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The above requirement may be easy and much clear to understand in the re-phrased structure as “<em>One cup sugarless tea for diabetic patient</em>”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Similar simple scenario in different context, tea for <strong>5</strong> people, <strong>2</strong> cups for <strong>diabetic patients.</strong> The requirement seems too simple and may be understandable enough but still lacks clarity and completeness thus, can be re-phrased as “<strong><em>5</em></strong><em> cups of <strong>tea</strong>, <strong>2</strong> cups <strong>sugar free</strong> for <strong>diabetic patient</strong> and <strong>3</strong> cups for <strong>non-diabetic</strong> people</em>”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Even though elaborated, above examples still may be incomplete and confusing if they do not have other relevant data specified like the type of tea i.e., Black tea/ dark (strong) tea/ Light tea or if the ingredients-wise classification is not clear like Ginger tea/ Lemon tea, etc.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The above example may not seem much technical but it explains the context either way. As stated earlier there is little done and exists that can be a vital workout for these classic chaos, the woes are also due unavailability of standard and universal tools/ systems that can be used to mitigate and overcome the requirements management concerns. There are few traditional ways that industry knows and a few select tools that can be quite helpful to the software companies but depending on the availability and the requirements of the requirements management.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>What’s the current story?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Presently, till I know, excel and or word doc based requirements management is one of the widely used (accepted) and a classic way of organizing, managing and maintaining the requirements. It still takes the major share in the industry because of its simplicity and easy availability. But this is really a cumbersome job when it comes to the part of gathering these requirements to define the specifications and the higher level designing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Now, as the software development process is gradually changing and the development techniques have been faster and more time-bound it is crucial that the requirements needs to be properly formatted and well organized and conveyed thus, managed and maintained. This may not be true enough in case of traditional excel/ word doc based methods.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Any Tool supports?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is a critical and more or less complex question to answer with justification that is there any tool that helps in managing the requirements management but, up to greater extent the answer is yes and there are few valuable and useful tools that would really help managing these tasks, some of the software’s that are available are JAMA’s requirements managements tools and Rational’s DOORS, RaQuest and few others which are very less known or either used.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Is it wise investing in tool?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This is very crucial question that needs to be very well justified that whether the investment on a tool for just a single task is enough and worth? Will it give the intended ROI? And what if the expectations fail? Because investing in any tool is a big cost and software companies usually do not make up themselves for investing on tools. Ideally, it is a wise decision that investing in a tool will definitely be helpful and guarantee better process approach and organizing of requirements managements activities. But, the decision is of management; as cost factor that matters!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>How about Test management tools?</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Thinking in different way is considering the Test Management as an alternative and this is really value driven approach in order to get more from the investment made as many of them provide or possess the requirements management capabilities as well. Today, there are many test management tools available in market and many of them have their own advantages and disadvantages like QC, ClearQuest, SilkCenter, QMERTY, etc all with their unique features and functions. While, QMERTY is one of the tools that is used usually for Test management activities in many organizations with one of its extreme valuable feature of “Requirements management”.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">QMETRY (<a href="http://www.qmetry.com/">http://www.qmetry.com</a>) provides extensive capability to manage requirements and link them to testcases as well as defects for traceability analysis. By defining Requirements, you can plan and manage tests that are more focused on your specific business needs. Not only this but as requirements are also associated to tests and defects to provide complete traceability and to aid the decision-making process. QMETRY with its advanced search feature allows you to locate any requirement within seconds and see all versions. In<span> </span>addition, QMetry has a highly demanding and well formatted reporting mechanism which provides basic reports and allows you to generate advanced reports based off your requirements. Just select your requirements and plug away, simple yet efficient. Just as if you invest and then earn the interest with periodic bonus because QMETRY is just not a requirements management tool but a complete test management tool so the ROI is assured and highly appreciated!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Hence, managing requirements is not just easier task but needs sufficient time and proper organizing capabilities in order to manage and coordinate them. As if the foundation is laid it must be strong enough and always one grade ahead than the target so as to withstand the structure strongly and unmoved, thus building the foundation strong!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">References:</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span>Effective Requirements Definitions and Management, White Paper. Source – Borland.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span>Introduction to Requirements – The Details That Make or Break a Project. Source –Global Knowledge.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span>7 Essential Tips to Ensure Success with Requirements Management. Source - Jama Software.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span>The Secret to Designing Products Customers Love – Manage Requirements Effectively. Source – Aberdeen Group.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span>Requirements planning: overlooked and undervalued. Source – IBM.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><a href="http://www.wikipedia.com/">www.wikipedia.com</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span><span>·<span> </span></span></span><a href="http://www.qmetry.com/">www.qmetry.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=62</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>which is the best test management tool ?</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=60</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=60#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 05:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yatender3@yahoo.com</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am searching for  test management tool, which should have all features e.g. Test case creation edit, deletion, Test Run creation, edit, deletion, test execution status updation, report generation, linking to defects management system etc.
which is the best test management tool ?
Can someone help me out selecting test management tool ?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am searching for  test management tool, which should have all features e.g. Test case creation edit, deletion, Test Run creation, edit, deletion, test execution status updation, report generation, linking to defects management system etc.</p>
<p>which is the best test management tool ?</p>
<p>Can someone help me out selecting test management tool ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=60</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reporting in Test Management Tools:</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=54</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=54#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rapunzel</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Dashboard]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QA]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Reports]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=54</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At the heart of Test Management lie organization, planning, authoring, execution, and reporting. In the contemporary times where teams are geographically distributed, operating in different time zones and functioning collaboratively - working on multiple projects &#38; different modules, testing in tandem with various other tools, it is totally inhuman to ask the testing team to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify;"><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">At the heart of Test Management lie organization, planning, authoring, execution, and reporting. In the contemporary times where teams are geographically distributed, operating in different time zones and functioning collaboratively - working on multiple projects &amp; different modules, testing in tandem with various other tools, it is totally inhuman to ask the testing team to sit and draft the statistically representable and comprehendible status summary by the end of the day, for their higher ups for their perusal.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify;"><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Reporting is a very vital feature of a test management tool which enables the testing team to focus on what they are best at – Testing! The gratuitous efforts spend on summarizing the status report and making them presentable can be eliminated by an efficient reporting facility provided in a test management tool.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify;"><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Reporting comprises mainly of graphically summarized information as well as detailed reports which are either replicas of are Excel/word/pdf.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><em><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">A good reporting system should provide:</span></em></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">The Dashboards: graphical summary of the statistics</span></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Information in an easy to use/comprehend format</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Should exhibit live/dynamically updated data</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Should show data/stats on mouse over</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Graphs/chart in relevant structure (for e.g): </span>
<ul>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Pie chart for distribution</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Bar charts for comparison</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Line graphs for timeline comparison</span></li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="150%;">Ability to view the information/metrics in the desired format – graphical/tabular</span></li>
<li><span style="150%;">Complete drill down to fetch the information/data lying behind the graph on a click of a button on the graph</span></li>
<li><span style="150%;">Ability to remember the charts most frequently visited</span></li>
<li><span style="150%;">Metrics that can be downloaded and distributed to the team members/managers</span></li>
<li><span style="150%;">Base to pull out multiple charts at one time for comparison of information across parameters i.e. timelines/components/team members working on it etc.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="150%;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify;"><em><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Reports: <span> </span>detailed information viewed/downloaded for reference:</span></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Should be viewable/downloadable in desired format (xls, rtf, pdf)</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Should provide an interface to modify/ write commands to pull out any relevant/required information from the tool for reporting purposes</span></li>
<li><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">Should be easy to use and maintain</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">So, the bottom line is that, the reporting should be so easy that even our Managers should be able to get it and comprehend it.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify;"><span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;,&quot;serif&quot;;">At QMetry we have kept the reporting very SIMPLE to use, Easy to comprehend and Flexible to customize.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=54</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Outsourcing Testing – Call of the Hour</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=36</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=36#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marcus</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[outsourcing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Outsourcing testing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As testing is a science in itself and the activities involved within testing are always never-ending (recursive), outsourcing these activities not only reduces the burden of the organizations developing software but also guarantees a much reliable and quality software in affordable way; this reliability is achieved due to the disciplined approach and well defined/ designed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify"><span style="Arial;">As testing is a science in itself and the activities involved within testing are always never-ending (recursive), outsourcing these activities not only reduces the burden of the organizations developing software but also guarantees a much reliable and quality software in affordable way; this reliability is achieved due to the disciplined approach and well defined/ designed test activity plans done by professional independent testing companies. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="0in 0in 0pt"><span style="Arial;"><span style="AR-SA;">According to the Gartner Research Report, ‘Market Trends: Application Development, Worldwide, 2008-2013’, the global software testing market equals $13 billion and the global market size of outsourced QA &amp; Testing services is around $6.1 billion. Analysts from Gartner believe that the appeal of QA &amp; Testing outsourcing will be increased in the near future due to the companies ‘understanding that offshore services are a valuable tool in leveraging testers’ expertise, tools and processes and reducing the cost of testing, while improving the overall application quality. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="Arial;">Why outsourcing?</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify"><span style="Arial;"><strong>Current Issues:</strong></span><span style="Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">1.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Insufficient time:</span></em><span style="Arial;"> This is a major issue that every organization faces during entire development process of any software application. Tight deadlines in delivering the product (which need to be strictly followed), many times become a crucial player in dropping testing activity or winding it up in a shorter time.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">2.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Unskilled Manpower:</span></em><span style="Arial;"> Another major impacting factor is the unavailability of proper and skilled resources, which usually results when testing is not planned properly and no proper testing cycle is implemented or not at all considered. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">3.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Limited budget:</span></em><span style="Arial;"> Budget is also one of the major factors that sometimes affect the software development cycle which limits the testing cycles to one or two. Insufficient budget margins not only limits the testing activities but also limits the testing types/ phases needed based on the software application, which if bypassed may result in huge impact on the overall quality.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">4.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Lack of focus consideration: </span></em><span style="Arial;">Organizations which develop complete software (right from initiation till closure) are involved in many activities; various phases are to be considered during this entire process in strict time frames, thus the focus is diverse with major focus on development and completion of the tasks (which are back to back) as earlier as possible which many times deviates the focus of testing leaving it unattained.<span style="yes">  </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify"><span style="Arial;"><strong>Benefits:</strong></span><span style="Arial;"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">1.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Focus on core competency: </span></em><span style="Arial;">Most of the outsourcing firms are involved in to the same kind of activities i.e., testing, thus, developing a good and competent resource is not a challenge and is many times readily available.<em> </em></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">2.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Better output due to activity outsourced to the firm specializing in the same domain: </span></em><span style="Arial;">As most of the outsourcing organizations are specialized in specific domains and technologies and focus on particular fields, choosing a right outsourcing partner based on the core competencies always result in huge gains.<em></em></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">3.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Marginally less investment cost: </span></em><span style="Arial;">As outsourcing do not involve much investment like, resource management cost, cost for planning, infrastructure, etc. it is much cheaper and cost effective and can be achieved in much less investment as compared to the investment required in deploying an in-house testing activity. Also, there is no maintenance cost required if the task is outsourced. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">4.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Optimum time, task and resource management with higher productivity: </span></em><span style="Arial;">The outsourcing firms with their expertise in specific domains and on particular technologies and testing activities can manage tasks and resources in much better manner by optimum time utilization as the major focus and goal is to deliver quality product with reliable and stable service to their clients.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="list .5in"><em><span style="Arial;"><span style="Ignore">5.<span style="'Times New Roman';">       </span></span></span></em><em><span style="Arial;">Stronger risk assessment and management: </span></em><span style="Arial;">With testing becoming as major and prime task for outsourcing organizations it gives deep focus on the major impacts, potential risks and other quality hazards due to regular work and the previous experience, this helps the outsourcing firms in much better way to manage risks and plan the activities based on the risks involved and their priority. This also leads to well planned risk mitigation management and avoiding potential risks.</span><span style="Arial;"><span style="yes"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify"><span style="Arial;"><strong>Outsourcing</strong> is just not a business partnership but also collaboration for transformation towards mutual growth which, can also lead a dying/ failing business to a leading business (leader) because of its numerous hidden advantages (value-adds). Thus, in today’s competitive market moving to outsourcing is call of the hour, a wise decision!</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="justify"> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=36</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Test Management Tools are required?</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=31</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=31#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Test Management Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rapid progression in technology just highlights the fact further that test
management is no longer optional. Test Management tools are necessary as they
enable objectivity and eciency. A proper test management tool can help address
several areas of concern:

What to test and how does it help to address business objectives?
Where we are in the testing cycle and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rapid progression in technology just highlights the fact further that test</p>
<p>management is no longer optional. Test Management tools are necessary as they</p>
<p>enable objectivity and eciency. A proper test management tool can help address</p>
<p>several areas of concern:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>What to test and how does it help to address business objectives?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Where we are in the testing cycle and what is the coverage?</strong></li>
<li><strong>To address the change in business lifecycle, what should QA team be doing next?</strong></li>
<li><strong>What are the risks and how are they being mitigated?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Are we doing enough to meet customer expectations?</strong></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=31</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Test Automation &#38; it&#8217;s Benefits</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=25</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bhaskar.joshi</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Automation benefits]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QMetry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Test Automation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Test Management Tools]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is Test Automation?
 Test automation is the use of software to control the execution of tests, the comparison of actual outcomes to predicted outcomes, the setting up of test preconditions, and other test control and test reporting functions. Commonly, test automation involves automating a manual process already in place that uses a formalized testing process.
 Testing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="Calibri;">What is Test Automation?</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span style="Calibri;">Test automation is the use of software to control the execution of tests, the comparison of actual outcomes to predicted outcomes, the setting up of test preconditions, and other test control and test reporting functions. Commonly, test automation involves automating a manual process already in place that uses a formalized testing process.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span style="Calibri;">Testing tools can help automate tasks such as product installation, test data creation, GUI interaction, problem detection, defect logging, etc.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span style="Calibri;">Test Automation requires appropriate planning i.e. which tests we have to automate and which we have to perform manually. Also, test automation is implemented where the <span style="underline;">functionality is stable</span> in the application over volatile ones.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <strong><span style="Calibri;">Benefits of Test Automation:</span></strong> </p>
<ol>
<li><span class="tdvamseel"><span style="Calibri;">Fast: Time duration of the testing process will reduce drastically since testing is a repetitive activity throughout the development cycle. </span></span></li>
<li><span class="tdvamseel"><span style="Calibri;">Reliable: Accuracy of the testing will be high in automation testing than manual testing.</span></span></li>
<li><span style="Calibri;">Repeatable:</span><span style="Calibri;"> can test how the software reacts under repeated execution of the same operations.</span></li>
<li><span class="tdvamseel"><span style="Calibri;">Comprehensive: Effectiveness of the application will be improved and can rerun the scripts across multiple platforms simultaneously.</span></span></li>
<li><span class="tdvamseel"><span style="Calibri;">Reusable: creates scripts for reusable tests that can be run each time the site or application changes</span></span></li>
<li><span class="tdvamseel"><span style="Calibri;">Cost Effective: Total cost of performing manual testing is </span></span><span style="Calibri;">exorbitant in comparison to automated testing. By executing automation scripts the rate of error will be less than manual testing and it can execute the tests much faster.</span></li>
<li><span style="Calibri;">Improves Quality: By repeatedly executing the automated scripts, more defects can be found and further improvement of the quality of end product can be done .With Automation we can run more tests in less time with fewer resources.</span> </li>
</ol>
<p><strong></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="Calibri;">Type of Test Automation Approach:</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="Calibri;">There are two general approaches to test automation:</span></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="underline;"><span style="Calibri;">Graphical user interface testing:</span></span></strong><span style="Calibri;"> A testing framework generates user interface events and observes the changes that result in the user interface, to validate that the observable behavior of the program is correct.</span><br />
<span style="&quot;Times New Roman&quot;;">Many test automation tools provide <strong>record</strong> and <strong>playback</strong> features that allow users to record interactively user actions and replay it back any number of times, comparing actual results to those expected. The advantage of this approach is that it requires little or no software development.</span>.<span> </span></li>
</ul>
<ul type="disc">
<li class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="underline;"><span style="Calibri;">Code-driven testing:</span></span></strong><span style="Calibri;"> The public (usually) interface to classes, modules, or libraries are tested with a variety of input arguments to validate that the results that are returned are correct. Code-driven testing </span>allows the code to conduct unit tests to determine whether various sections of the code are acting as expected under various circumstances. Test cases describe tests that need to be run on the program to verify that the program runs as expected.</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <strong><span style="Calibri;">Integration of Test Automation Tool and Test Management Tool:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <span style="Calibri;">In the test management tool, we have an entry of automated Testcases so we can integrate it with the test automation tool. Automated Testcases will be automatically executed and their result will be compared with the expected result in the test management tool. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="Calibri;">Also, the actual result and status will get updated automatically in the test management tool. By using Test Automation tool, we can send the acknowledgment mail with the automated Testcases status to the QA persons.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <strong><span style="Calibri;">References:</span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="Calibri;"><a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/">http://www.wikipedia.org/</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=25</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Common features in agile testing</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=23</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=23#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iterative development
&#8211;Running, tested features developed in order of business priority
Responsive to changing requirements
&#8211;Many opportunities to re-prioritise and re-evaluate
‘Travel light’
Favour conversations over documentation and formal process
Customer (Product Owner) is part of the team
&#8211;Empowered customer rep either on-site or accessible to the team, provides constant feedback on quality and priorities
Focus on delivering Business Value
&#8211;Everything costs, so don’t [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><strong>Iterative development</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;Running, tested features developed in order of business priority</span></div>
<div><strong>Responsive to changing requirements</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;Many opportunities to re-</span><span>prioritise</span><span> and re-evaluate</span></div>
<div><strong>‘Travel light’</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>Favour conversations over documentation and formal process</span></div>
<div><strong>Customer (Product Owner) is part of the team</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;Empowered customer rep either on-site or accessible to the team, provides constant feedback on quality and priorities</span></div>
<div><strong>Focus on delivering Business Value</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;Everything costs, so don’t do anything that doesn’t add value!</span></div>
<div><strong>Test-Driven</strong></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;High emphasis on testing early, testing often &amp; testing fast</span></div>
<div><strong>Restrospectives</strong><span> </span></div>
<div class="O1"><span>&#8211;The team review and improve their own processes regularly</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=23</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agile Techniques</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=20</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=20#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QMetry_09</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Agile]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Waterfall]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agile techniques: Many organizations have begun to use agile development techniques. These practices put a premium value on collaboration and alter the development cycle because requirements are changing and being completed incrementally as the project is under way. Agile methods also focus on the drive to push quality upstream through techniques such as unit testing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="Default"><strong><span>Agile techniques: </span></strong><span>Many organizations have begun to use agile development techniques. These practices put a premium value on collaboration and alter the development cycle because requirements are changing and being completed incrementally as the project is under way. Agile methods also focus on the drive to push quality upstream through techniques such as unit testing and code reviews. Agile practices are encouraging vendors in the tool market to build tools that recognize these process changes and address the shift from isolated specialist tools to coordinated suites that share information and manage and update each other in a complementary fashion. <strong>For example, leading tool support integration between software requirements and test plans, and as requirements grow or change, will force a vendor to update its test plan. This collaborative capability is especially important for globally dispersed organizations to keep information loss among groups to a minimum.</strong></span></p>
<p class="Default">
<p class="Default"><span><strong>Source: Gartner </strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=20</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Testing tool Market</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=18</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=18#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QMetry_09</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The overall distributed testing tool market is valued at more than $1 billion and has been growing consistently at 10% to 12% during the past five years. Gartner expects this growth to accelerate due to the demands of SOA and replacement of legacy applications with new packages and custom solutions. New companies continue to enter [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">The overall distributed testing tool market is valued at more than $1 billion and has been growing consistently at 10% to 12% during the past five years. Gartner expects this growth to accelerate due to the demands of SOA and replacement of legacy applications with new packages and custom solutions. New companies continue to enter the market, as established vendors continue to fill out suites through acquisitions. As organizations seek to better manage software assets and face increased complexity, competition and regulations, they are finding that quality management tools and practices provide a fundamental baseline to drive positive results. This need will be especially acute as organizations shift from early Web services implementations to developing SOA, and as packages expand to become service-oriented business applications. <strong>SAAS based tool is an answer to companies trying to minimize their investments in tools.</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<p class="MsoNormal">Source: Gartner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=18</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Test Management?</title>
		<link>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=16</link>
		<comments>http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=16#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>QMetry_09</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[QMetry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Quality Assurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[SaaS]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[test management tool]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.qmetry.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Creating an organized test plan has become extremely important for software companies because of the hyper competitive software industry. The time, capabilities, bandwidth and other resources are limited, so it is critical to make sure that testing professionals are extremely comprehensive while executing their test scripts. However, in tough economic times like today, having a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Creating an organized test plan has become extremely important for software companies because of the hyper competitive software industry. The time, capabilities, bandwidth and other resources are limited, so it is critical to make sure that testing professionals are extremely comprehensive while executing their test scripts. However, in tough economic times like today, having a solid test plan is not enough; a more dynamic approach is required to cut costs by eliminating unwanted tests without compromising on a comprehensive risk and security testing. To ensure this “Just Enough” approach to testing, test management becomes critical. Test Management involves leveraging a collection of processes and tools that enables testers to take a more strategic approach to testing, prioritizing key test functions, accounting for risk, planning for coverage, and controlling test execution. By employing effective test management, software development companies will ensure that they run the right tests, and avoid releasing an application that is not ready for prime time. There are several test management tools available, each with their own set of capabilities, limitations and complexities. Also, most tools available today are costly in terms of license fee and the hardware and software resources required. It becomes paramount to find the best tool that meets all your needs.</p>
<p><strong>Why QMetry?</strong></p>
<p>QMetry is the most comprehensive, flexible and affordable test management tool available in the market. It caters to QA teams of all sizes. It has brought test management to masses by offering a SaaS based delivery model. It draws all advantages of the SaaS features, and enhances the overall test management experience. QMetry drives a more effective and efficient global application testing process and supports high levels of communication and collaboration among geographically distributed testing teams. QMetry seamlessly integrates with your existing defect tracking systems like Bugzilla, JIRA and Mantis and test automation tools like Silktest and Quicktest, further enhancing their usability of yourexisting tool investments. It helps in involving analysts more directly in overall quality efforts, along with a shift in focus from finding defects to validation; to ensuring business objectives are being met. QMetry provides a user friendly interface, with powerful capabilities that help QA teams to integrate, communicate and co-ordinate the entire testing process in the most effective manner. QMetry provides a greater visibility of the entire testing process to geographically distributed teams and clients.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.qmetry.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=16</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
